ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025
The analysis of methylamphetamine and para-hydroxy-methylamphetamine in post-mortem hair samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- The analysis of methylamphetamine and para-hydroxy-methylamphetamine in post-mortem hair samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
External contamination is a well-recognized limitation of hair analysis for drugs of abuse like methylamphetamine (MA), and there are no guidelines regarding the analysis of specific metabolites of MA to assist interpretation. We developed an analytical method to detect MA, amphetamine (AMP), and para-hydroxy-methylamphetamine (p-OH-MA) in hair and present their concentrations among a cohort of deceased persons positive for MA in blood (n = 63). Hair samples (≤ 3 cm) were washed with dichloromethane and water prior to extraction using a methanolic micro-pulverization. The reconstituted hair extracts were separated on a UCT Selectra® Aqueous C18 HPLC Column (100 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm) by gradient elution and detected using a Sciex Triple Quad 6500+ system. Validation was satisfactory, and the lower limits of quantitation were 0.01 ng/mg for MA and AMP and 0.001 ng/mg for p-OH-MA. The median hair concentrations of MA, AMP, and p-OH-MA were 13 ng/mg (range = 0.015-49; n = 51), 1.1 ng/mg (range = 0.018-44; n = 60), and 0.020 ng/mg (range = 0.0012-0.38, n = 62), respectively. These concentrations in hair were strongly positively correlated (r = .7202 to .8641, p < .001), suggesting similar modes of incorporation. Moreover, the wash/hair ratios were indicative of external contamination, especially among the soiled group of hair samples. Therefore, further studies are necessary to determine concentrations of p-OH-MA in living MA users and confirm if this metabolite constitutes a potential marker of MA consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.