Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948916›Full record

ArticleMycoKeys2024

Surveying lichen diversity in forests: A comparison of expert mapping and eDNA metabarcoding of bark surfaces.

Lukas Dreyling, Steffen Boch, H Thorsten Lumbsch, Imke Schmitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MycoKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unassuming Lichens: Nature's Hidden Antimicrobial Warriors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas DreylingSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F) Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-9504
Steffen BochWSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, Switzerland WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research Birmensdorf Switzerland.
H Thorsten LumbschCollections, Conservation, and Research, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA The Field Museum Chicago United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-835X
Imke SchmittSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F) Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-0296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lichens are an important part of forest ecosystems, contributing to forest biodiversity, the formation of micro-niches and nutrient cycling. Assessing the diversity of lichenised fungi in complex ecosystems, such as forests, requires time and substantial skills in collecting and identifying lichens. The completeness of inventories thus largely depends on the expertise of the collector, time available for the survey and size of the studied area. Molecular methods of surveying biodiversity hold the promise to overcome these challenges. DNA barcoding of individual lichen specimens and bulk collections is already being applied; however, eDNA methods have not yet been evaluated as a tool for lichen surveys. Here, we assess which species of lichenised fungi can be detected in eDNA swabbed from bark surfaces of living trees in central European forests. We compare our findings to an expert floristic survey carried out in the same plots about a decade earlier. In total, we studied 150 plots located in three study regions across Germany. In each plot, we took one composite sample based on six trees, belonging to the species

Indexed as

Assessmentbiodiversitybioindicatorsconservationdatabasesfloristic surveyidentificationinventorymetabarcodingmonitoring

Identifiers

PMID38948916
PMCPMC11214015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.