ArticleNeurophotonics2024
BioLuminescent OptoGenetics in the choroid plexus: integrated opto- and chemogenetic control
Article in Neurophotonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The choroid plexus: a command center for brain-body communication during inflammation.Current opinion in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: The choroid plexus (ChP) epithelial network displays diverse dynamics, including propagating calcium waves and individuated fluctuations in single cells. These rapid events underscore the possibility that ChP dynamics may reflect behaviorally relevant and clinically important changes in information processing and signaling. Optogenetic and chemogenetic tools provide spatiotemporally precise and sustained approaches for testing such dynamics Aim: To test the viability of BL-OG/LMO for ChP control. Approach: Using transgenic and Cre-directed targeting to the ChP, we expressed LMO3 (a Results: Multiple routes of CTZ administration drove BL photon production, including intracerebroventricular, intravenous, and intraperitoneal injection. Intravenous administration resulted in fast "flash" kinetics that diminished in seconds to minutes, and intraperitoneal administration resulted in slow rising activity that sustained hours. Mice showed no consistent impact of 1 week of intraperitoneal CTZ administration on weight, drinking, motor behavior, or sleep/wake cycles. Conclusions: BL-OG/LMO provides unique advantages for testing the role of ChP dynamics in biological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.