Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948874›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Designing Cell-Type-Specific Promoter Sequences Using Conservative Model-Based Optimization.

Aniketh Janardhan Reddy, Xinyang Geng, Michael H Herschl, Sathvik Kolli, Aviral Kumar, Patrick D Hsu, Sergey Levine, Nilah M Ioannidis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aniketh Janardhan ReddyUniversity of California, Berkeley.ORCID 0000-0002-9782-5361
Xinyang GengUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Michael H HerschlUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Sathvik KolliUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Aviral KumarUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Patrick D HsuUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Sergey LevineUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Nilah M IoannidisUniversity of California, Berkeley.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Personal Genome InterpretationR00HG009677 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IOANNIDIS, NILAH MONNIER · 2019 to 2021
$634k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG009677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapies have the potential to treat disease by delivering therapeutic genetic cargo to disease-associated cells. One limitation to their widespread use is the lack of short regulatory sequences, or promoters, that differentially induce the expression of delivered genetic cargo in target cells, minimizing side effects in other cell types. Such cell-type-specific promoters are difficult to discover using existing methods, requiring either manual curation or access to large datasets of promoter-driven expression from both targeted and untargeted cells. Model-based optimization (MBO) has emerged as an effective method to design biological sequences in an automated manner, and has recently been used in promoter design methods. However, these methods have only been tested using large training datasets that are expensive to collect, and focus on designing promoters for markedly different cell types, overlooking the complexities associated with designing promoters for closely related cell types that share similar regulatory features. Therefore, we introduce a comprehensive framework for utilizing MBO to design promoters in a data-efficient manner, with an emphasis on discovering promoters for similar cell types. We use conservative objective models (COMs) for MBO and highlight practical considerations such as best practices for improving sequence diversity, getting estimates of model uncertainty, and choosing the optimal set of sequences for experimental validation. Using three relatively similar blood cancer cell lines (Jurkat, K562, and THP1), we show that our approach discovers many novel cell-type-specific promoters after experimentally validating the designed sequences. For K562 cells, in particular, we discover a promoter that has 75.85% higher cell-type-specificity than the best promoter from the initial dataset used to train our models.

Identifiers

PMID38948874
PMCPMC11213138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.