Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948708›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Reading reshapes stimulus selectivity in the visual word form area.

Vassiki S Chauhan, Krystal C McCook, Alex L White

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vassiki S ChauhanDepartment of Neuroscience & Behavior Barnard College, Columbia University 76 Claremont Ave New York, NY 10027 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9612-2402
Krystal C McCookDepartment of Neuroscience & Behavior Barnard College, Columbia University 76 Claremont Ave New York, NY 10027 USA.
Alex L WhiteDepartment of Neuroscience & Behavior Barnard College, Columbia University 76 Claremont Ave New York, NY 10027 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-742X

Funding

Capacity limits in the neural circuitry of visual word recognitionR00EY029366 · NEI · BARNARD COLLEGE · PI WHITE, ALEXANDER LINDLEY · 2021 to 2023
$746k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY029366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading depends on a brain region known as the "visual word form area" (VWFA) in left ventral occipito-temporal cortex. This region's function is debated because its stimulus selectivity is not absolute, it is modulated by a variety of task demands, and it is inconsistently localized. We used fMRI to characterize the combination of sensory and cognitive factors that activate word-responsive regions that we precisely localized in 16 adult humans (4 male). We then presented three types of character strings: English words, pseudowords, and unfamiliar characters with matched visual features. Participants performed three different tasks while viewing those stimuli: detecting real words, detecting color in the characters, and detecting color in the fixation mark. There were three primary findings about the VWFA's response: (1) It preferred letter strings over unfamiliar characters even when the stimuli were ignored during the fixation task; (2) Compared to those baseline responses, engaging in the word reading task

Identifiers

PMID38948708
PMCPMC11212929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.