Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948538›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

When birds of a feather flock together: Severe genomic erosion and the implications for genetic rescue in an endangered island passerine.

Emily L Cavill, Hernán E Morales, Xin Sun, Michael V Westbury, Cock van Oosterhout, Wilna Accouche, Anna Zora, Melissa J Schulze, Nirmal Shah, Pierre-André Adam and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic Rescue: Latest Advances and Applications.Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emily L CavillThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-8102
Hernán E MoralesThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Xin SunThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Michael V WestburyThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Cock van OosterhoutSchool of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park Norwich UK.
Wilna AccoucheGreen Islands Foundation Victoria Seychelles.
Anna ZoraFregate Island Sanctuary Ltd Victoria Seychelles.
Melissa J SchulzeCousine Island Company Providence Seychelles.
Nirmal ShahNature Seychelles Roche Caiman Seychelles.
Pierre-André AdamIsland Conservation Society Pointe Larue Seychelles.
M de L BrookeDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Paul SweetAmerican Museum of Natural History New York USA.
Shyam GopalakrishnanThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
M Thomas P GilbertThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Seychelles magpie-robin's (SMR) five island populations exhibit some of the lowest recorded levels of genetic diversity among endangered birds, and high levels of inbreeding. These populations collapsed during the 20th century, and the species was listed as Critically Endangered in the IUCN Red List in 1994. An assisted translocation-for-recovery program initiated in the 1990s increased the number of mature individuals, resulting in its downlisting to Endangered in 2005. Here, we explore the temporal genomic erosion of the SMR based on a dataset of 201 re-sequenced whole genomes that span the past ~150 years. Our sample set includes individuals that predate the bottleneck by up to 100 years, as well as individuals from contemporary populations established during the species recovery program. Despite the SMR's recent demographic recovery, our data reveal a marked increase in both the genetic load and realized load in the extant populations when compared to the historical samples. Conservation management may have reduced the intensity of selection by increasing juvenile survival and relaxing intraspecific competition between individuals, resulting in the accumulation of loss-of-function mutations (i.e. severely deleterious variants) in the rapidly recovering population. In addition, we found a 3-fold decrease in genetic diversity between temporal samples. While the low genetic diversity in modern populations may limit the species' adaptability to future environmental changes, future conservation efforts (including IUCN assessments) may also need to assess the threats posed by their high genetic load. Our computer simulations highlight the value of translocations for genetic rescue and show how this could halt genomic erosion in threatened species such as the SMR.

Indexed as

avian conservationendangered speciesgenetic bottleneckgenetic rescuegenomic erosionmuseomics

Identifiers

PMID38948538
PMCPMC11212007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.