ReviewCancer innovation2024
A comprehensive review of 3D cancer models for drug screening and translational research.
Review in Cancer innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Bioprinting-Microfabrication Approach to Controllable Multitype Spheroid Arrays for Modeling Tumor Heterogeneity.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Review
- Matrix Stiffness Directs Stemness Signatures in Breast Cancer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Article
- From Signaling Pathways to Combination Therapy: Bioactive Compounds against Cancer Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Targeting Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase to Reduce the Progression of Ovarian Cancer Cells in a 3D Collagen Model.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Peroxiredoxin 1 as a novel pyroptosis inducer in colorectal cancer: Insights and future directions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Scaffold-free 3D-cell co-culture model system for the study of metastatic cancer in the brain TME.PloS one · 2026Article
- Electrospun nanofibers for gastric cancer: local therapeutics, biomimetic models, and diagnostic interfaces.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Tools of the trade: leveraging 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Spheromatrix: a paper-based platform for scalable 3D tumor model generation, cryopreservation, and high-throughput drug assessment.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- E-Cadherin Regulates HIF1-α In Vitro in Induced 3D Spheroid Models of Human Breast Cancer Through Both mTOR and Notch1 Signaling.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Navigating Cancer Treatment: A Journey from 2D to 3D Cancer Models and Nanoscale Therapies.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Scaffold-free 3D-Cell Co-Culture Model System for the Study of Metastatic Cancer Cell Behavior in the Brain TME.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Permeable Hydrogel Encapsulated Osteosarcoma-on-a-Chip for High-Throughput Multi-Drugs Screening.Smart medicine · 2025Article
- A perspective on patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse models for identification of novel and individualized treatment for sarcoma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Microwave-assisted immunostaining for rapid labeling of matrix-embedded multicellular structures.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Extended passaging of the SKOV3 ovarian cancer cell line leads to two phenotypically different strains.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Article
- Plasticity of Expression of Stem Cell and EMT Markers in Breast Cancer Cells in 2D and 3D Culture Depend on the Spatial Parameters of Cell Growth; Mathematical Modeling of Mechanical Stress in Cell Culture in Relation to ECM Stiffness.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 3D cancer models fill the discovery gap of 2D cancer models and play an important role in cancer research. In addition to cancer cells, a range of other factors include the stroma, density and composition of extracellular matrix, cancer-associated immune cells (e.g., cancer-associated fibroblasts cancer cell-stroma interactions and subsequent interactions, and a number of other factors (e.g., tumor vasculature and tumor-like microenvironment in vivo) has been widely ignored in the 2D concept of culture. Despite this knowledge, the continued use of monolayer cell culture methods has led to the failure of a series of clinical trials. This review discusses the immense importance of tumor microenvironment (TME) recapitulation in cancer research, prioritizing the individual roles of TME elements in cancer histopathology. The TME provided by the 3D model fulfills the requirements of in vivo spatiotemporal arrangement, components, and is helpful in analyzing various different aspects of drug sensitivity in preclinical and clinical trials, some of which are discussed here. Furthermore, it discusses models for the co-assembly of different TME elements in vitro and focuses on their synergistic function and responsiveness as tumors. Furthermore, this review broadly describes of a handful of recently developed 3D models whose main focus is limited to drug development and their screening and/or the impact of this approach in preclinical and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.