ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Assessment of average femoral component rotation for balancing functionally aligned total knee replacement in varus deformity: Robotic image guidance study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medial expected gap (mEG): a quantitative, biology-guided predictor of coronal plane correction and knee balance in robotic functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Patellofemoral alignment safe zones in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty do not affect outcomes but do influence patellar resurfacing rates.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Does patellar resurfacing matter in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with functional alignment principles?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- The role of next-generation robotic systems in transforming knee arthroplasty: precision and beyond.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and purpose: Ensuring proper femoral component alignment post-Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for normal patellofemoral (PF) kinematics. However, the customary 3° external rotation relative to the Posterior Condylar Axis (PC Axis) may not universally apply, and the expected final femoral component rotation remains unclear in functionally aligned knees. This study examines the relation between the Transepicondylar Axis (TEA) and PC axis, known as Posterior Condylar Angle (PCA) in Indian patients along with factors influencing PCA, and the feasibility of reproducing patient-specific PCA using image-guided Cuvis joint robot. Methods: Forty patients (52 Knees) with primary osteoarthritis and varus deformity were prospectively evaluated. Native PCA was determined using CT-based J planner. Pre-operative patellar shape, PF tilt, PF shift, final femoral component rotation (representing post-operative PCA), final patellar tracking, and post-operative functional and radiological assessment at 3 months were recorded. Results: Study participants averaged 64.3 years of age, with a female-to-male ratio of 23 to 17. Varus deformities varied, with IA2 being most prevalent, and sagittal plane deformities included fixed flexion (34.6 %) and hyperextension (44.2 %). The average PCA was 1.9° (range: 0°-7.3°), with most knees (41 out of 52) below 3°. The majority had Wiberg type 1 patellae, with pre-operative patellar tilt averaging 5.63°, reducing post-operatively to 4.43°. Most patients (37 out of 40) achieved excellent Knee Society functional scores at the 3-month mark. Complications included one case of delayed wound healing and one femoral array pin breakage. Notably, our study revealed a significant deviation in PCA from the commonly reported 3° in Western literature, underscoring the need for region-specific considerations in TKA planning. Conclusion: PCA of our population is statistically different from customary 3° followed with jig system. Image guided Robotics helps to identify patients specific PCA and reproducing the same was more commonly possible in patients with reducible Varus deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.