Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948370›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Single-Center, Non-randomized Study with 2-Year Follow-Up.

Madhan Jeyaraman, Naveen Jeyaraman, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Rajni Ranjan, Saurabh Kumar Jha, Ashim Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparative outcome analyses of subchondralWorld journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-9493
Naveen JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4362-3326
Swaminathan RamasubramanianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600002 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-8427
Rajni RanjanDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201306 India.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-6970
Saurabh Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201310 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-0755
Ashim GuptaSouth Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute (STORI Inc.), Laredo, TX 78045 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1224-2755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread, disabling condition with no intervention to fully restore cartilage or halt progression. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), an autologous product from bone marrow aspiration, has shown promise as a regenerative therapy due to its cell composition and chondrogenic effects. Our study aims to assess the functional outcomes, including pain, function, satisfaction, and complications post-BMAC injection in knee OA patients. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, 63 patients with grade II-III knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale) unresponsive to conservative management underwent BMAC injection. The procedure involved bone marrow aspiration from the anterior iliac crest, processing to obtain a concentrate, followed by intra-articular injection. Patients were followed for 24 months, assessing outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and MOCART 2.0 score. Results: The cohort, with a slight female predominance and predominantly aged 41-50 years, majorly comprised K-L grade III OA patients. BMAC treatment resulted in significant improvements in VAS pain scores, IKDC functional scores, and MOCART 2.0 scores over the 24-month follow-up. Conclusion: BMAC injection provides significant improvement in both pain and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate OA of the knee. Further high-quality, adequately powered, multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are necessary to justify the routine clinical use of BMAC for treatment of patients suffering with knee OA. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

BMACBone marrow aspirateBone marrow aspirate concentrateKneeKnee osteoarthritisRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID38948370
PMCPMC11208343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.