Antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of enzymatic hydrolysates from red tilapia (

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Antitumor Effects of Collagen Peptide Nanoemulsion and Nanoliposome Prepared from Taiwan Tilapia Skin in a Mouse Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
   Article
2. Valorization of rabbit viscera by enzymatic hydrolysis: bioactive peptides with antioxidant and cell viability properties.Food science of animal resources · 2026
   Article
3. Antioxidant Peptides and Protein Hydrolysates from Tilapia: Cellular and In Vivo Evidences for Human Health Benefits.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as