ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Diversity in Lacrimal Pathway Morphology Among Patients with Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental anatomy of the lacrimal sac fossa and nasolacrimal canal: a CT study of paediatric patients.Eye (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Anatomic features of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a comparative computed tomography study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Natural Course, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Dacryoendoscopy: Historical development, philosophical foundation, and clinical perspective.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This prospective observational study aimed to explore the diversity in lacrimal pathway morphology among patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) by examining dacryocystography (DCG) images. Patients and Methods: The study included 64 patients who underwent DCG before undergoing general anesthesia probing for unilateral CNLDO. Several parameters were measured from the lateral view of the DCG images: (1) the lacrimal sac (LS) and the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) angle, (2) the angle formed by the superior orbital rim (SOR), LS, and the NLD, (3) LS length, and (4) bony NLD length. Additionally, frontal views of the DCG images were utilized to measure (5) LS-NLD angle and (6) LS angle concerning the midline. Results: The average age of the patients was 34.3 months. The mean ± standard deviation of the measurements of the above parameters was (1) -1.2° ± 16.5° (range: -44.6° ± 46.6°), (2) -5.0° ± 10.3° (range: -24.0° ± 19.0°), (3) 10.2 ± 2.4 mm (range: 6.5-16.0 mm), (4) 8.0 ± 2.5 mm (range: 3.1-14.8 mm), (5) 15.6° ± 11.2° (range: -16.8° ± 41.0°), and (6) 15.1 ± 5.2° (range: 3.3°-29.8°). All parameters, except for parameter (3), conformed to a normal distribution. Conclusion: This study provides valuable anthropometric data derived from DCG images, highlighting the substantial variability in lacrimal pathway morphology among patients with CNLDO. Furthermore, anatomical constraints made probing with a straight metal bougie anatomically infeasible in 25.0% of the patients included in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.