ArticleCancer innovation2024
A lactate-responsive gene signature predicts the prognosis and immunotherapeutic response of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Cancer innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic immune checkpoints (MICs) in cancer: from molecular mechanisms to challenges and opportunities in clinical translation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Development of a lactate metabolism signature for predicting homologous recombination repair status in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prognosis and Immunotherapy Effect of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Lactylation-Related Genes and Experimental Validation.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Developments in the study of the role of lactate metabolism in the genesis and progression of thyroid cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- A lactate-responsive gene signature predicts the prognosis and immunotherapeutic response of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.Cancer innovation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increased glycolytic activity and lactate production are characteristic features of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The aim of this study was to determine whether a subset of lactate-responsive genes (LRGs) could be used to classify TNBC subtypes and predict patient outcomes. Methods: Lactate levels were initially measured in different breast cancer (BC) cell types. Subsequently, MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 2-Deoxy-d-glucose or l-lactate were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). The gene set variation analysis algorithm was utilized to calculate the lactate-responsive score, conduct a differential analysis, and establish an association with the extent of immune infiltration. Consensus clustering was then employed to classify TNBC patients. Tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion, cibersort, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis, and EPIC, were used to compare the tumor-infiltrating immune cells between TNBC subtypes and predict the response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, a prognostic model was developed by combining 98 machine learning algorithms, to assess the predictive significance of the LRG signature. The predictive value of immune infiltration and the immunotherapy response was also assessed. Finally, the association between lactate and various anticancer drugs was examined based on expression profile similarity principles. Results: We found that the lactate levels of TNBC cells were significantly higher than those of other BC cell lines. Through RNA-seq, we identified 14 differentially expressed LRGs in TNBC cells under varying lactate levels. Notably, this LRG signature was associated with interleukin-17 signaling pathway dysregulation, suggesting a link between lactate metabolism and immune impairment. Furthermore, the LRG signature was used to categorize TNBC into two distinct subtypes, whereby Subtype A was characterized by immunosuppression, whereas Subtype B was characterized by immune activation. Conclusion: We identified an LRG signature in TNBC, which could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with TNBC and gauge their response to immunotherapy. Our findings may help guide the precision treatment of patients with TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.