Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948251›Full record

ArticleCancer innovation2024

A lactate-responsive gene signature predicts the prognosis and immunotherapeutic response of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Kaixiang Feng, Youcheng Shao, Jun Li, Xiaoqing Guan, Qin Liu, Meishun Hu, Mengfei Chu, Hui Li, Fangfang Chen, Zongbi Yi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kaixiang FengDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Wuhan China.
Youcheng ShaoDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Developmentally Originated Disease, TaiKang Medical School (School of Basic Medical Sciences) Wuhan University Wuhan China.
Jun LiDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Wuhan China.
Xiaoqing GuanDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Developmentally Originated Disease, TaiKang Medical School (School of Basic Medical Sciences) Wuhan University Wuhan China.
Qin LiuDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Developmentally Originated Disease, TaiKang Medical School (School of Basic Medical Sciences) Wuhan University Wuhan China.ORCID 0009-0000-1919-8027
Meishun HuDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Wuhan China.
Mengfei ChuDepartment of Human Anatomy, TaiKang Medical School (School of Basic Medical Sciences) Wuhan University Wuhan China.
Hui LiDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Developmentally Originated Disease, TaiKang Medical School (School of Basic Medical Sciences) Wuhan University Wuhan China.
Fangfang ChenDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Wuhan China.
Zongbi YiDepartment of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Wuhan China.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-6633
Jingwei ZhangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Wuhan China.ORCID 0000-0002-4188-2236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increased glycolytic activity and lactate production are characteristic features of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The aim of this study was to determine whether a subset of lactate-responsive genes (LRGs) could be used to classify TNBC subtypes and predict patient outcomes. Methods: Lactate levels were initially measured in different breast cancer (BC) cell types. Subsequently, MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 2-Deoxy-d-glucose or l-lactate were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). The gene set variation analysis algorithm was utilized to calculate the lactate-responsive score, conduct a differential analysis, and establish an association with the extent of immune infiltration. Consensus clustering was then employed to classify TNBC patients. Tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion, cibersort, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis, and EPIC, were used to compare the tumor-infiltrating immune cells between TNBC subtypes and predict the response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, a prognostic model was developed by combining 98 machine learning algorithms, to assess the predictive significance of the LRG signature. The predictive value of immune infiltration and the immunotherapy response was also assessed. Finally, the association between lactate and various anticancer drugs was examined based on expression profile similarity principles. Results: We found that the lactate levels of TNBC cells were significantly higher than those of other BC cell lines. Through RNA-seq, we identified 14 differentially expressed LRGs in TNBC cells under varying lactate levels. Notably, this LRG signature was associated with interleukin-17 signaling pathway dysregulation, suggesting a link between lactate metabolism and immune impairment. Furthermore, the LRG signature was used to categorize TNBC into two distinct subtypes, whereby Subtype A was characterized by immunosuppression, whereas Subtype B was characterized by immune activation. Conclusion: We identified an LRG signature in TNBC, which could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with TNBC and gauge their response to immunotherapy. Our findings may help guide the precision treatment of patients with TNBC.

Indexed as

immunotherapylactaterisk modelsubtypeTNBC

Identifiers

PMID38948251
PMCPMC11212277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.