Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948162›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Evaluation of the Implementation of Integrated Primary Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension in Belgium, Cambodia, and Slovenia.

Nataša Stojnić, Monika Martens, Edwin Wouters, Savina Chham, Josefien van Olmen, Katrien Danhieux, Nina Ružić Gorenjec, Ir Por, Antonija Poplas-Susič, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nataša StojnićCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1338-4774
Monika MartensDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1432-0684
Edwin WoutersCentre for Population, Family & Health, Department of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-3829
Savina ChhamNational Institute of Public Health, Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-9037
Josefien van OlmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-1887
Katrien DanhieuxDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6064-5335
Nina Ružić GorenjecCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8505-1437
Ir PorNational Institute of Public Health, Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3493-2749
Antonija Poplas-SusičCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-3333
Zalika Klemenc-KetišCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-1754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Integrated care of chronic patients improves quality of their management, but there is scarce evidence of its implementation in different healthcare settings. With this article, we wanted to determine the level of integrated care implementation in the management of T2D (diabetes) and HT (hypertension) in three different settings: Belgium, Slovenia, and Cambodia. Methods: This was an observational study with integrated approach. It was conducted in primary health care organisations in three countries. In each primary health care organisation, we aimed to include primary care workers that worked with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HT) patients. Data was collected with the Integrated Care Package (ICP) grid (consisting of six elements: identification, treatment, health education, self-management, caregiver collaboration, and care organisation). Results: ICP is almost completely implemented without major differences within Slovenia. There is a considerable variability across practice types in Belgium. Implementation is constrained by health system resources in Cambodia. Some elements, especially identification, are better implemented then others, across health systems. Conclusion: Countries can enhance integrated care for chronic diseases by implementing central policies, standardized protocols, and local adaptation, addressing resource constraints, promoting systematic screening and health education, and providing training for healthcare workers, tailored to community needs, to improve patient outcomes and healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

cross country comparisondiabeteshypertensionintegrated care packageprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38948162
PMCPMC11212773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.