ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Variable Energy and Ultrasound-based Liposculpture of the Arms: Multicenter and Multidevice Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cold Versus Warm Tumescent Solution in Arm Liposculpture: A Double-blind Clinical Study.
Effects of QUANTUM Probe for Skin Rejuvenation and Subdermal Retraction in Patients Undergoing High-Definition Liposculpture
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Brachioplasty in the Post-bariatric Patient-A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Helium Plasma Radiofrequency (Renuvion).Annals of plastic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Relevance of Skin Tightening with Minimally Invasive Subdermal Energy-Based (EB) Technologies.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Literature Review and Evidence-Based Comparative Analysis of Traditional Suction-Assisted Lipectomy (SAL) vs. Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction (UAL) Reported Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Vital signs following autotransfusion in liposuction and concurrent aesthetic procedures.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incorporation of new technologies to assist the liposuction procedure is becoming increasingly common. These technologies allow for a softer technique, balanced shaping, elimination of excess adipose tissue, and skin tightening. Some of these technologies include ultrasound (US; US-assisted liposculpture, VASER-assisted liposuction), power suction (power-assisted liposuction), radiofrequency (RF; RF-assisted lipolysis), and laser (laser-assisted liposuction). In addition, some of these devices have been shown to reduce the incidence of hematomas/inflammation and shorten recovery time. We report our experience in high-definition liposculpture of the arms in addition to new technologies to improve skin retraction, comparing their results in terms of complications, satisfaction score, and aesthetic outcomes. We included patients with mild-to-moderate arm dermatochalasis (Duncan classification) fat deposits in the upper extremities who were considered candidates for third-generation US-assisted liposculpture, power-assisted liposuction, RF-assisted lipolysis/skin tightening, and laser-assisted liposuction. A total of 683 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Most of them were women (n = 605, 88%). Fat grafting was performed in 80 patients (11.7%). A significant portion of the patients were secondary cases (n = 223, 33%). Age ranged from 18 to 70 years (median = 38 years). BMI ranged from 17.8 to 34.8 kg/m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.