Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38948010›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

racoon_clip-a complete pipeline for single-nucleotide analyses of iCLIP and eCLIP data.

Melina Klostermann, Kathi Zarnack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melina KlostermannFaculty of Biosciences, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences & Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-1095
Kathi ZarnackFaculty of Biosciences, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences & Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-3378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: A vast variety of biological questions connected to RNA-binding proteins can be tackled with UV crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) experiments. However, the processing and analysis of CLIP data are rather complex. Moreover, different types of CLIP experiments like iCLIP or eCLIP are often processed in different ways, reducing comparability between multiple experiments. Therefore, we aimed to build an easy-to-use computational tool for the processing of CLIP data that can be used for both iCLIP and eCLIP data, as well as data from other truncation-based CLIP methods. Results: Here, we introduce racoon_clip, a sustainable and fully automated pipeline for the complete processing of iCLIP and eCLIP data to extract RNA binding signal at single-nucleotide resolution. racoon_clip is easy to install and execute, with multiple pre-settings and fully customizable parameters, and outputs a conclusive summary report with visualizations and statistics for all analysis steps. Availability and implementation: racoon_clip is implemented as a Snakemake-powered command line tool (Snakemake version ≥7.22, Python version ≥3.9). The latest release can be downloaded from GitHub (https://github.com/ZarnackGroup/racoon_clip/tree/main) and installed via pip. A detailed documentation, including installation, usage, and customization, can be found at https://racoon-clip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/. The example datasets can be downloaded from the Short Read Archive (SRA; iCLIP: SRR5646576, SRR5646577, SRR5646578) or the ENCODE Project (eCLIP: ENCSR202BFN).

Identifiers

PMID38948010
PMCPMC11213630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.