ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2024
Hyperacute experimental model of rat lung transplantation using a coronary shunt cannula.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung transplantation is a well-established treatment of end-stage lung disease. A rodent model is an inexpensive way to collect biological data from a living model after lung transplantation. However, mastering the surgical technique takes time owing to the small organ size.
aimTo conduct rat lung transplantation using a shunt cannula (SC) or modified cannula (MC) and assess their efficacy.
methodsRat lung transplantation was performed in 11 animals in the SC group and 12 in the MC group. We devised a method of rat lung transplantation using a coronary SC for coronary artery bypass surgery as an anastomosis of pulmonary arteriovenous vessels and bronchioles. The same surgeon performed all surgical procedures in the donor and recipient rats without using a magnifying glass. The success rate of lung transplantation, operating time, and PaO2 values were compared after 2-h reperfusion after transplantation.
resultsTen and 12 lungs were successfully transplanted in the SC and MC groups, respectively. In the SC group, one animal had cardiac arrest within 1 h after reperfusion owing to bleeding during pulmonary vein anastomosis. The operating time for the removal of the heart-lung block from the donor and preparation of the left lung graft was 26.8 ± 2.3 and 25.7 ± 1.3 min in the SC and MC groups, respectively (
conclusionA hyperacute rat lung transplantation model using a coronary SC was created using a simple technique. The MC was inexpensive, easy to prepare, and simple to operate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.