Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947958›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2024

A rapid prototyped atmospheric non-thermal plasma-activated aerosol device and anti-bacterial characterisation.

Jefferson de Oliveira Mallia, Sholeem Griffin, Clara Buttigieg, Ruben Gatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jefferson de Oliveira MalliaMetamaterials Unit, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Sholeem GriffinMetamaterials Unit, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Clara ButtigiegMetamaterials Unit, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Ruben GattMetamaterials Unit, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-plasma technologies are being extensively investigated for their potential to mitigate microbial growth through the production of various reactive species. Predominantly, studies utilise atmospheric non-thermal plasma to produce plasma-activated liquids. The advancement of plasma-liquid applications has led to the investigation of plasma-activated aerosols (PAAs). This study aimed to produce a rapid-prototyped plasma-activated aerosol setup and perform chemical and anti-bacterial characterisation on the resultant activated aerosols. The setup was produced using stereolithography 3D printing, and air was used as the carrier gas. The novel design of the device allowed for the direct production of PAAs without the prior generation of plasma-activated water and subsequent aerosolisation. The generated PAAs were assessed for nitrite, hydrogen peroxide and ozone content using colourimetric assays. Anti-bacterial efficacy was tested against three human pathogenic strains:

Indexed as

3D printedanti-bacterialatmospheric non-thermal plasmaplasma-activated aerosolsrapid prototyped

Identifiers

PMID38947958
PMCPMC11211520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.