Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947921›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection.

Huiming Xia, My Hoang, Evelyn Schmidt, Susanna Kiwala, Joshua McMichael, Zachary L Skidmore, Bryan Fisk, Jonathan J Song, Jasreet Hundal, Thomas Mooney and 6 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Huiming XiaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
My HoangDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Evelyn SchmidtDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Susanna KiwalaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joshua McMichaelMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Zachary L SkidmoreDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bryan FiskDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jonathan J SongDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jasreet HundalMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas MooneyMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jason R WalkerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
S Peter GoedegebuureDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher A MillerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
William E GillandersDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Obi L GriffithDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Malachi GriffithDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Standardized and Genome-Wide Clinical Interpretation of Complex Genotypes for Cancer Precision MedicineU24CA237719 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Genomic and Functional Identification of Chemotherapy Resistance Mechanisms in Small Cell Lung CancerU01CA231844 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOVINDAN, RAMASWAMY, GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Informatics tools for identification, prioritization and clinical application of neoantigensU01CA248235 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, MALACHI · 2020 to 2022
$1.3M
DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATICS RESOURCES FOR INTERPRETATION OF CLINICALLY ACTIONABLE VARIANTS IN CANCERU01CA209936 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2016 to 2018
$1.0M
Integrated Analysis & Interpretation of Whole Genome Exome & Transcriptome SequenR00HG007940 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, MALACHI · 2017 to 2019
$724k
DEFINING THE REGULATORY, NON-CODING, MUTATIONAL LANDSCAPE OF BREAST CANCERK22CA188163 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2014 to 2016
$515k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA188163NCI NIH HHS U01 CA209936NCI NIH HHS U01 CA231844NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248235NCI NIH HHS U24 CA237719NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG007940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoantigen targeting therapies including personalized vaccines have shown promise in the treatment of cancers, particularly when used in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy. At least 100 clinical trials involving these therapies are underway globally. Accurate identification and prioritization of neoantigens is highly relevant to designing these trials, predicting treatment response, and understanding mechanisms of resistance. With the advent of massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing technologies, it is now possible to computationally predict neoantigens based on patient-specific variant information. However, numerous factors must be considered when prioritizing neoantigens for use in personalized therapies. Complexities such as alternative transcript annotations, various binding, presentation and immunogenicity prediction algorithms, and variable peptide lengths/registers all potentially impact the neoantigen selection process. There has been a rapid development of computational tools that attempt to account for these complexities. While these tools generate numerous algorithmic predictions for neoantigen characterization, results from these pipelines are difficult to navigate and require extensive knowledge of the underlying tools for accurate interpretation. This often leads to over-simplification of pipeline outputs to make them tractable, for example limiting prediction to a single RNA isoform or only summarizing the top ranked of many possible peptide candidates. In addition to variant detection, gene expression and predicted peptide binding affinities, recent studies have also demonstrated the importance of mutation location, allele-specific anchor locations, and variation of T-cell response to long versus short peptides. Due to the intricate nature and number of salient neoantigen features, presenting all relevant information to facilitate candidate selection for downstream applications is a difficult challenge that current tools fail to address. Results: We have created pVACview, the first interactive tool designed to aid in the prioritization and selection of neoantigen candidates for personalized neoantigen therapies including cancer vaccines. pVACview has a user-friendly and intuitive interface where users can upload, explore, select and export their neoantigen candidates. The tool allows users to visualize candidates across three different levels, including variant, transcript and peptide information. Conclusions: pVACview will allow researchers to analyze and prioritize neoantigen candidates with greater efficiency and accuracy in basic and translational settings The application is available as part of the pVACtools pipeline at pvactools.org and as an online server at pvacview.org.

Indexed as

Cancer ImmunotherapyNeoantigenPipelinePrioritizationVaccine designVisualization

Identifiers

PMID38947921
PMCPMC11213132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.