ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
A transformer-based multi-task deep learning model for simultaneous T-stage identification and segmentation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of AI-Driven Applications for Screening Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Pooled it
- N-Unet: An Efficient Multi-Task Model for Precise Classification and Segmentation of Breast Ultrasound Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Casting wider than U-Nets: evaluating the role of novel machine learning applications in radiation therapy.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- MambaGLA-NPC: a 3D framework integrating CNN and state space models for robust multi-center nasopharyngeal carcinoma segmentation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Article
- Assessment of transformer-based AI in clinical oncology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- The use of artificial intelligence in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate tumor target contouring and T staging are vital for precision radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Identifying T-stage and contouring the Gross tumor volume (GTV) manually is a laborious and highly time-consuming process. Previous deep learning-based studies have mainly been focused on tumor segmentation, and few studies have specifically addressed the tumor staging of NPC. Objectives: To bridge this gap, we aim to devise a model that can simultaneously identify T-stage and perform accurate segmentation of GTV in NPC. Materials and methods: We have developed a transformer-based multi-task deep learning model that can perform two tasks simultaneously: delineating the tumor contour and identifying T-stage. Our retrospective study involved contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI) of 320 NPC patients (T-stage: T1-T4) collected between 2017 and 2020 at our institution, which were randomly allocated into three cohorts for three-fold cross-validations, and conducted the external validation using an independent test set. We evaluated the predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and accuracy (ACC), with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and the contouring performance using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). Results: Our multi-task model exhibited sound performance in GTV contouring (median DSC: 0.74; ASD: 0.97 mm) and T staging (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.87) across 320 patients. In early T category tumors, the model achieved a median DSC of 0.74 and ASD of 0.98 mm, while in advanced T category tumors, it reached a median DSC of 0.74 and ASD of 0.96 mm. The accuracy of automated T staging was 76% (126 of 166) for early stages (T1-T2) and 64% (99 of 154) for advanced stages (T3-T4). Moreover, experimental results show that our multi-task model outperformed the other single-task models. Conclusions: This study emphasized the potential of multi-task model for simultaneously delineating the tumor contour and identifying T-stage. The multi-task model harnesses the synergy between these interrelated learning tasks, leading to improvements in the performance of both tasks. The performance demonstrates the potential of our work for delineating the tumor contour and identifying T-stage and suggests that it can be a practical tool for supporting clinical precision radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.