Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947837›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

On the Use of the Intrinsic DNA Fluorescence for Monitoring Its Damage: A Contribution from Fundamental Studies.

Dimitra Markovitsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dimitra MarkovitsiUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut de Chimie Physique, UMR8000, 91405 Orsay, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-305X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of DNA damage by means of appropriate fluorescent probes is widely spread. In the specific case of UV-induced damage, it has been suggested to use the emission of dimeric photoproducts as an internal indicator for the efficacy of spermicidal lamps. However, in the light of fundamental studies on the UV-induced processes, outlined in this review, this is not straightforward. It is by now well established that, in addition to photodimers formed via an electronic excited state, photoionization also takes place with comparable or higher quantum yields, depending on the irradiation wavelength. Among the multitude of final lesions, some have been fully characterized, but others remain unknown; some of them may emit, while others go undetected upon monitoring fluorescence, the result being strongly dependent on both the irradiation and the excitation wavelength. In contrast, the fluorescence of undamaged nucleobases associated with emission from ππ* states, localized or excitonic, appearing at wavelengths shorter than 330 nm is worthy of being explored to this end. Despite its low quantum yield, it is readily detected nowadays. Its intensity decreases due to the disappearance of the reacting nucleobases and the loss of exciton coherence provoked by the presence of lesions, independently of their type. Thus, it could potentially provide valuable information about the DNA damage induced, not only by UV radiation but also by other sanitizing or therapeutic agents.

Identifiers

PMID38947837
PMCPMC11209687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.