Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947804›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Image-Based Detection of Adulterants in Milk Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Adhyayan Mamgain, Virkeshwar Kumar, Susmita Dash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adhyayan MamgainDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India.
Virkeshwar KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-5679
Susmita DashDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-4209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adulteration of milk poses a severe human health hazard. Existing methods for detecting adulterants such as water, urea, ammonium sulfate (AmS), oils, and surfactants in milk are selective, expensive, and often challenging to implement in rural areas. The present work shows the potential of machine learning to detect milk adulterants using patterns of evaporative milk deposits. The final deposit patterns obtained after evaporation of the adulterated milk droplets are used to create an image data set. This data set is used to develop a deep learning model that deploys a convolutional neural network (CNN/ConvNet) to classify the distinct evaporation patterns obtained for different types and concentrations of adulterants. Further, we apply implicit and explicit regularization and compare their accuracies. The models trained with different regularization optimization schemes demonstrate that a CNN can be successfully implemented to detect adulterants in milk. Additionally, we experimentally determine how the type and concentration of milk adulterants, including ammonium sulfate (AmS), urea, oil, and surfactants, affect milk evaporative deposition. Added AmS and urea in milk crystallizes during evaporation to produce recognizable patterns that can be used for their detection. The method is capable of detecting AmS added in excess of 2.4% and urea in excess of 5% in diluted milk (20 wt %) due to the crystallization of AmS and urea, respectively. In the case of milk adulterated with vegetable oil, evaporation leads to the separation and accumulation of oil at the top of the deposit, leading to the detection of oil present in excess of 2% in 20% diluted milk. Furthermore, a minimum individual amount of 5% urea, 2.4% AmS, and 2% oil concentration in diluted milk (20%) is shown to be individually detected by evaporation pattern-based technique when milk is adulterated with all the adulterants (water, urea, AmS, and oil + surfactant) together. When subjected to different regularization optimization schemes, the CNN gives varying degrees of accuracy for successful detection. The use of implicit regularization in the form of data augmentation gives the best results with a testing average accuracy of 98%, showing that a CNN can be successfully deployed to classify and detect adulterants in milk.

Identifiers

PMID38947804
PMCPMC11209888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.