ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Endohepatology in clinical practice: EUS-guided portal pressure measurement combined with EUS-guided liver biopsy and variceal screening and treatment in outpatients.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Development of Endo-hepatology.DEN open · 2027Review
- Joint effects of social determinants of health on NAFLD mortality: the mediating role of phenotypic age acceleration.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound versus direct transjugular portal pressure gradient in patients receiving TIPS: influence of portal vein thrombosis.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Noninvasive multimodal management of portal hypertension: from early screening to precision clinical decision-making.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Endohepatology: Evolving Indications, Challenges, Unmet Needs and Opportunities.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- The evolving role of endoscopic ultrasound from diagnosis to therapy in hepatic vascular interventions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in assessing liver function before liver-directed therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Advances in portal pressure measurement: Endoscopic techniques, challenges, and implications for liver transplantation.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided portosystemic pressure gradient measurementJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- The application of EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with concomitant EUS-liver elastography and EUS-guided liver biopsy in patients with chronic liver disease: a single center experience.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- EUS-guided liver biopsy: A useful and cost-effective alternative for specific indications in the study of liver diseases.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement for evaluating the severity of portal hypertension: A retrospective analysis.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Lessons learned from performing 100 EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement procedures.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (PPG) is a novel technique that permits a true, direct measure of portal vein pressure and hepatic vein pressure. This article details our experience and lessons learned from 20 consecutive outpatient EUS-PPG procedures performed at a single center, along with simultaneous EUS-guided liver biopsy, variceal screening, and variceal banding. Methods: Data on the first 20 patients who underwent EUS-PPG at a single center were retrospectively viewed and analyzed. The effects of various liver diseases or other patient-related factors on the clinical and technical success of EUS-PPG measurements, as well as EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB), were evaluated. During the procedure, if esophageal varices were encountered, they were assessed, and if felt to be clinically indicated, endoscopic variceal ligation was performed. Results: The 20 patients included 10 male and 10 female patients. All procedures were technically successful. In all patients, the portal vein and hepatic veins could be easily identified. One adverse event of bleeding occurred during the EUS-PPG measuring procedure. All 20 EUS-LBs were technically successful and yielded adequate samples for histological evaluations, with an average of 25 complete portal tracts per sample. Among patients with esophageal varices, 40% of patients underwent banding. The mean EUS-PPG among 5 patients with esophageal varices was 11.6 mm Hg, compared with 3.2 mm Hg among 15 patients without esophageal varices. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that EUS-PPG is a novel, safe, reproducible, and effective technique. Also, the fact that EUS-PPG, EUS-LB, variceal screening, and variceal banding could be performed in 1 session and on an outpatient basis speaks to the growing relevance and impact of the nascent field of endohepatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.