ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
A risk-scoring model based on endobronchial ultrasound multimodal imaging for predicting metastatic lymph nodes in lung cancer patients.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Global trends and academic landscapes of ultrasound applications in lung cancer research: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2024).Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Review
- Does endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging challenge EUS?Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Feasibility of thin convex probe EBUS scope for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) imaging is a valuable tool for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in lung cancer patients. This study aimed to develop a risk-scoring model based on EBUS multimodal imaging (grayscale, Doppler mode, elastography) to predict LN metastasis in lung cancer patients. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 350 metastatic LNs in 314 patients with lung cancer and 124 reactive LNs in 96 patients with nonspecific inflammation. The sonographic findings were compared with the final pathology results and clinical follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent risk factors of metastatic LNs. According to the Results: Multivariate analysis showed that short axis >10 mm, distinct margin, absence of central hilar structure, presence of necrosis, nonhilar vascularity, and elastography score 4 to 5 were independent predictors of metastatic LNs. Both short axis and margin were scored 1 point, and the rest of independent predictors were scored 2 points. The combination of 3 EBUS modes had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic and accuracy of 0.884 (95% confidence interval, 0.846-0.922) and 87.55%, respectively. The risk stratification was as follows: 0 to 2 points, malignancy rate of 11.11%, low suspicion; 3 to 10 points, malignancy rate of 86.77%, high suspicion. Conclusions: The risk-scoring model based on EBUS multimodal imaging can effectively evaluate metastatic LNs in lung cancer patients to support clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.