ArticleCureus2024
A Chronological Overview of Using Deep Learning for Leukemia Detection: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An AI-powered self-driving microscope for low-cost acute leukemia detection.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukemia is a rare but fatal cancer of the blood. This cancer arises from abnormal bone marrow cells and requires prompt diagnosis for effective treatment and positive patient prognosis. Traditional diagnostic methods (e.g., microscopy, flow cytometry, and biopsy) pose challenges in both accuracy and time, demanding an inquisition on the development and use of deep learning (DL) models, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), which could allow for a faster and more exact diagnosis. Using specific, objective criteria, DL might hold promise as a tool for physicians to diagnose leukemia. The purpose of this review was to report the relevant available published literature on using DL to diagnose leukemia. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, articles published between 2010 and 2023 were searched using Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science, searching the terms "leukemia" AND "deep learning" or "artificial neural network" OR "neural network" AND "diagnosis" OR "detection." After screening retrieved articles using pre-determined eligibility criteria, 20 articles were included in the final review and reported chronologically due to the nascent nature of the phenomenon. The initial studies laid the groundwork for subsequent innovations, illustrating the transition from specialized methods to more generalized approaches capitalizing on DL technologies for leukemia detection. This summary of recent DL models revealed a paradigm shift toward integrated architectures, resulting in notable enhancements in accuracy and efficiency. The continuous refinement of models and techniques, coupled with an emphasis on simplicity and efficiency, positions DL as a promising tool for leukemia detection. With the help of these neural networks, leukemia detection could be hastened, allowing for an improved long-term outlook and prognosis. Further research is warranted using real-life scenarios to confirm the suggested transformative effects DL models could have on leukemia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.