Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947609›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Unveiling, Analyzing the Mechanisms of, and Proposing Solutions for Bribery in Japan's Medical Device Sector.

Akihiko Ozaki, James Larkin, Natsuya Sakata, Yudai Kaneda, Erika Yamashita, Hiroaki Saito, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Mihajlo Jakovljevic

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akihiko OzakiBreast and Thyroid Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, JPN.
James LarkinDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, IRL.
Natsuya SakataSchool of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, JPN.
Yudai KanedaSchool of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, JPN.
Erika YamashitaHealthcare, Medical Governance Research Institute, Tokyo, JPN.
Hiroaki SaitoGastroenterology, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, JPN.
Tetsuya TanimotoInternal Medicine, Navitas Clinic, Tokyo, JPN.
Mihajlo JakovljevicInstitute of Comparative Economic Studies, Hosei University, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both public and academic scrutiny of the financial relationships between the medical device industry and the healthcare society occur less frequently than those involving the pharmaceutical industry, and Japan is no exception to these shortcomings. This paper examines the ethical and legal challenges inherent in Japan's medical device industry through the lens of bribery scandals, placing these issues within the broader context of global healthcare corruption. It aims to derive lessons and suggest universal strategies for ethical and legal enhancements. The discussion includes two notable cases: one involving inappropriate transactions between a cancer center and a biliary stent manufacturer, and another concerning a corrupt donation scheme between a medical device company and a university's anesthesiology department, which was found guilty. In our analysis, we also acknowledge the industry's efforts toward compliance and reform to maintain a balanced perspective. The analysis not only highlights the unique culture and structure of the Japanese medical device industry, such as the exploitation of flexible pricing and opaque financial practices but also contrasts these issues with the tightly regulated pharmaceutical industry. This approach reveals both sector-specific challenges and common corruption drivers, enhancing our understanding of why such scandals occur and persist. We propose ethical and compliance-focused business measures such as centralizing donation decisions, limiting the financial independence of marketing divisions, and increasing transparency, alongside adopting mandatory disclosure practices based on successful models from the United States and Europe. By emphasizing integrity and presenting diverse perspectives, this study aims to elevate ethical and legal standards in the medical device industry and improve patient health outcomes worldwide.

Indexed as

healthcare professionalsjapanmedical devicespost-marketing surveillancetransparency

Identifiers

PMID38947609
PMCPMC11211963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.