ArticleHeliyon2024
Epidemiology, risk factors, and vaccine effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers during the omicron pandemic in Shanghai, China.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed healthcare workers (HCWs) to serious risk of infection. The aims of our study were to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs, and evaluate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) during the Omicron pandemic in Shanghai, China. Methods: Active surveillance of COVID-19 was performed among HCWs who worked in Shanghai General Hospital from December 2022 to January 2023. A case-control study was conducted by questionnaire survey to analyse the infection-related risk factors. A retrospective cohort study was explored to evaluate VE against primary infection. Results: During the Omicron outbreak, 2,008 of 2,460 (81.6%) HCWs were infected with SARS-CoV-2. The infection rate was higher in women, younger age groups, nurses and medical technicians. Among the 1,742 participants in the questionnaire, 1,463 (84.0%) were tested positive, and 95.1% of them developed symptoms. Most of the infections (53.0%) were acquired outside the hospital. The risk factors associated with higher odds of infection were working in the emergency department (aOR 3.77, 95% CI 1.69-8.38) and medical examination area (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.10-5.51). The protective factors associated with lower odds of infection were previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 (aOR 0.01, 95% CI 0-0.07) and receiving four doses of vaccines (aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.97). For frontline HCWs, those who had oral-nasal exposure to coworkers were more likely to be infected (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21-2.51). In VE analysis, the risk of primary infection was lower in HCWs who received the emergency heterologous booster (the fourth dose) during the epidemic (aHR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15-0.40), resulting in an adjusted-VE of 75.1%. Conclusions: In response to future pandemic, it is important for public health policies to aim at protecting HCWs through risk-differentiated infection control measures, strengthening personal protection and recommending vaccination to vulnerable individuals before the arrival of Omicron wave.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.