Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947422›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2023

Testing ethical impact assessment for nano risk governance.

Ineke Malsch, Panagiotis Isigonis, Evert Bouman, Antreas Afantitis, Georgia Melagraki, Maria Dusinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ineke MalschMalsch TechnoValuation, Utrecht, 3582EX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-0609
Panagiotis IsigonisCa' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Veneto, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-7708
Evert BoumanNILU, Kjeller, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-9580
Antreas AfantitisNova Mechanics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Georgia MelagrakiNova Mechanics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Maria DusinskaNILU, Kjeller, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-1652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk governance of nanomaterials and nanotechnologies is traditionally mainly limited to risk assessment, risk management and life cycle assessment. Recent approaches have experimented with widening the scope and including economic, social, and ethical aspects. This paper reports on tests and stakeholder feedback on the use of ethical impact assessment guidelines and tools adapting CEN Workshop Agreement part 2 CWA 17145-2:2017 (E)) to support risk governance of nanomaterials, in the RiskGONE project.

Indexed as

ethical impact assessmentethicsnanomaterialsrisk governance

Identifiers

PMID38947422
PMCPMC11211730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.