ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2024
Circulating cell-free (cf)DNA analysis: Current technologies and applications in gynecologic cancer.
Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond CA-125: circulating cell-free DNA as the next-generation biomarker in ovarian malignancy.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- LINE-1 hypomethylation in cell-free DNA of high-grade glioma patients correlates with tissue levels and is associated with reduced DNMT1 and H4K20me3 expression.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial DNA Copy-Number Assessment Is a Potent Predictor for Prostate Cancer in White but Not Black Individuals.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in diseases of the female reproductive organs.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis has several promising clinical applications in the management of cancer patients, with clinical validity established in different types of solid tumors (e.g., lung, breast, and colon cancer). Cancers harbor unique genetic alterations that can be detected in the plasma and other bodily fluids of cancer patients, constituting an alternate source of tumor-derived DNA. Technologic advances and wide-spread availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) have made sequencing analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) possible, employing both off-the-shelf and personalized tumor-informed panels. Tumor size, disease burden and high-grade histologic types have been shown to correlate with ctDNA levels across multiple solid cancer types. Detection of tumor-derived genetic alterations in plasma-derived cfDNA can facilitate diagnosis, guide treatment selection, and serve as a biomarker for treatment response and prognostication. Molecular residual disease (MRD) is at the forefront of cfDNA analysis, with implications in treatment de-escalation/ escalation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The development of cfDNA analysis in early detection of cancers is under active investigation. Proof-of-principles studies in gynecologic cancers have demonstrated feasibility and potential for innovation in cancers lacking specific biomarkers, including the tracking of human papillomavirus (HPV) cfDNA in patients with cervical cancer. In this review, we outline the assays currently available for cfDNA sequencing/ ctDNA detection, the role of cfDNA analysis in clinical decision-making and the current status and potential clinical uses of cfDNA research in gynecologic cancers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.