Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947315›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Second bone marrow transplantation into regenerating hematopoiesis enhances reconstitution of immune system.

Kateřina Faltusová, Martin Báječný, Tomáš Heizer, Petr Páral, Chia-Ling Chen, Katarína Szikszai, Pavel Klener, Emanuel Nečas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kateřina FaltusováInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Martin BáječnýInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Tomáš HeizerInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Petr PáralInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Chia-Ling ChenInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Katarína SzikszaiInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Pavel KlenerInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Emanuel NečasInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bone marrow transplantation (BMT), hematopoiesis-reconstituting cells are introduced following myeloablative treatment, which eradicates existing hematopoietic cells and disrupts stroma within the hematopoietic tissue. Both hematopoietic cells and stroma then undergo regeneration. Our study compares the outcomes of a second BMT administered to mice shortly after myeloablative treatment and the first BMT, with those of a second BMT administered to mice experiencing robust hematopoietic regeneration after the initial transplant. We evaluated the efficacy of the second BMT in terms of engraftment efficiency, types of generated blood cells, and longevity of function. Our findings show that regenerating hematopoiesis readily accommodates newly transplanted stem cells, including those endowed with a robust capacity for generating B and T cells. Importantly, our investigation uncovered a window for preferential engraftment of transplanted stem cells coinciding with the resumption of blood cell production. Repeated BMT could intensify hematopoiesis reconstitution and enable therapeutic administration of genetically modified autologous stem cells.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationHematopoiesisAnimalsHematopoietic Stem CellsImmune ReconstitutionMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRegenerationB cellshematopoiesisimmune systemregenerationstem cellT cellstransplantation

Identifiers

PMID38947315
PMCPMC11211250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.