Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947301›Full record

ArticleBelitung nursing journal2024

Concordance in the healthcare context: A concept analysis.

Anucha Taiwong, Wassana Uppor, Nisakorn Vibulchai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anucha TaiwongSrimahasarakham Nursing College, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-9542
Wassana UpporBoromarajonani College of Nursing, Suphanburi, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-0814
Nisakorn VibulchaiBoromarajonani College of Nursing, Nakhon Ratchasima, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1815-2101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The concept of concordance and its usage are indicative of patient-centered healthcare, which encourages an equitable collaboration between patients and clinicians. However, there is a lack of clarity in understanding concordance, and an analysis of this concept is warranted. Objective: This paper seeks to explore the essence of the concordance concept in the healthcare context. Methods: Walker and Avant's eight-step method of concept analysis was applied. A literature search was conducted using concordance AND concord as keywords on CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane database, and ScienceDirect databases, published between 2006 and 2022. Results: The attributes of concordance include communication process, therapeutic partnership, and agreement on treatment regimens. Antecedents of concordance comprise provider-patient relationship, patients' beliefs, healthcare providers' characteristics, and complexity of treatment plans. Consequences are improved adherence and compliance, improved clinical outcomes, and better quality of life. Conclusion: This paper offers clarification of concordance by presenting its antecedents, attributes, and consequences. The findings serve as a basis for developing assessments and nursing interventions to promote patient concordance. Nurses can use the findings to encourage concordance by establishing a trusty relationship during health encounters that respects patients' beliefs and effectively communicating to improve patients' understanding in dealing with complex treatment plans.

Indexed as

communicationconcept analysisconcordancehealthcarenursespatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID38947301
PMCPMC11211742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.