Microfluidic gut-axis-on-a-chip models for pharmacokinetic-based disease models.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Microphysiological models of human gastrointestinal diseases.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
   Review
2. Microengineered bone models: advances and applications of bone-on-a-chip technology.Journal of biological engineering · 2026
   Review
3. Molecular and mechanistic insights into the gut-liver axis inInfection and immunity · 2026
   Review
4. Oral microbiota-driven immune modulation along the oral-gut axis: from local signals to systemic inflammation.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract