Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947182›Full record

ArticleCell reports. Physical science2024

Microneedle-based sampling of dermal interstitial fluid using a vacuum-assisted skin patch.

Xue Jiang, Elizabeth C Wilkirson, Aaron O Bailey, William K Russell, Peter B Lillehoj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Physical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Ionic-Bionic Interfaces: Advancing Iontronic Strategies for Bioelectronic Sensing and Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Smart closed-loop drug delivery systems.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xue JiangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston 77005, TX, USA.
Elizabeth C WilkirsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston 77005, TX, USA.
Aaron O BaileyMass Spectrometry Facility, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550, TX, USA.
William K RussellMass Spectrometry Facility, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550, TX, USA.
Peter B LillehojDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston 77005, TX, USA.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial fluid (ISF) contains a wealth of biomolecules, yet it is underutilized for diagnostic testing due to a lack of rapid and simple techniques for collecting abundant amounts of fluid. Here, we report a simple and minimally invasive technique for rapidly sampling larger quantities of ISF from human skin. A microneedle array is used to generate micropores in skin from which ISF is extracted using a vacuum-assisted skin patch. Using this technique, an average of 20.8 μL of dermal ISF is collected in 25 min, which is an ∼6-fold improvement over existing sampling methods. Proteomic analysis of collected ISF reveals that it has nearly identical protein composition as blood, and >600 medically relevant biomarkers are identified. Toward this end, we demonstrate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in ISF collected from COVID-19 vaccinees using two commercial immunoassays, showcasing the utility of this technique for diagnostic testing.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnosticinterstitial fluidmicroneedleskin

Identifiers

PMID38947182
PMCPMC11211974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.