Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947003›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Advances in methods for characterizing dietary patterns: A scoping review.

Joy M Hutchinson, Amanda Raffoul, Alexandra Pepetone, Lesley Andrade, Tabitha E Williams, Sarah A McNaughton, Rebecca M Leech, Jill Reedy, Marissa M Shams-White, Jennifer E Vena and 7 more

Abstract readPreprintScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Joy M HutchinsonSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-7964
Amanda RaffoulDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-4999
Alexandra PepetoneSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Lesley AndradeSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Tabitha E WilliamsSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sarah A McNaughtonHealth and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5936-9820
Rebecca M LeechInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Victoria, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5333-0164
Jill ReedyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marissa M Shams-WhitePopulation Science Department, American Cancer Society, Washington DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7824-4545
Jennifer E VenaAlberta's Tomorrow Project, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kevin W DoddDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lisa M BodnarSchool of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9427-5467
Benoît LamarcheCentre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-5378
Michael P WallaceDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Megan DeitchlerIntake - Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI Solutions, Washington, DC, USA.
Sanaa HussainSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sharon I KirkpatrickSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-5975

Funding

Informing national guidelines on diet patterns that promote healthy pregnancy outcomesR01HD102313 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, NAIMI, ASHLEY ISAAC · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing focus on better understanding the complexity of dietary patterns and how they relate to health and other factors. Approaches that have not traditionally been applied to characterize dietary patterns, such as machine learning algorithms and latent class analysis methods, may offer opportunities to measure and characterize dietary patterns in greater depth than previously considered. However, there has not been a formal examination of how this wide range of approaches has been applied to characterize dietary patterns. This scoping review synthesized literature from 2005-2022 applying methods not traditionally used to characterize dietary patterns, referred to as novel methods. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched using keywords including machine learning, latent class analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Of 5274 records identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of 24 articles were published since 2020. Studies were conducted across 17 countries. Nine studies used approaches that have applications in machine learning to identify dietary patterns. Fourteen studies assessed associations between dietary patterns that were characterized using novel methods and health outcomes, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and asthma. There was wide variation in the methods applied to characterize dietary patterns and in how these methods were described. The extension of reporting guidelines and quality appraisal tools relevant to nutrition research to consider specific features of novel methods may facilitate complete and consistent reporting and enable evidence synthesis to inform policies and programs aimed at supporting healthy dietary patterns.

Identifiers

PMID38947003
PMCPMC11213084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.