Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946976›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Prediction of Adolescents' Fluid Intelligence Scores based on Deep Learning with Reconstruction Regularization.

TingQian Cao, Xiang Liu, Jiawei Luo, Yuqiang Wang, Shixin Huang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

TingQian CaoWest China Hospital of Sichuan University.
Xiang LiuSichuan University.
Jiawei LuoSichuan University.
Yuqiang WangWest China Hospital of Sichuan University.
Shixin HuangThe People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing city.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for uncorrected/actual fluid intelligence scores in 9-10 year old children using magnetic resonance T1-weighted imaging. Explore the predictive performance of an autoencoder model based on reconstruction regularization for fluid intelligence in adolescents. Methods: We collected actual fluid intelligence scores and T1-weighted MRIs of 11,534 adolescents who completed baseline tasks from ABCD Data Release 3.0. A total of 148 ROIs were selected and 604 features were proposed by FreeSurfer segmentation. The training and testing sets were divided in a ratio of 7:3. To predict fluid intelligence scores, we used AE, MLP and classic machine learning models, and compared their performance on the test set. In addition, we explored their performance across gender subpopulations. Moreover, we evaluated the importance of features using the SHapley Additive Explain method. Results: The proposed model achieves optimal performance on the test set for predicting actual fluid intelligence scores (PCC = 0.209 ± 0.02, MSE = 105.212 ± 2.53). Results show that autoencoders with refactoring regularization are significantly more effective than MLPs and classical machine learning models. In addition, all models performed better on female adolescents than on male adolescents. Further analysis of relevant characteristics in different populations revealed that this may be related to gender differences in underlying fluid intelligence mechanisms. Conclusions: We construct a weak but stable correlation between brain structural features and raw fluid intelligence using autoencoders. Future research may need to explore ensemble regression strategies utilizing multiple machine learning algorithms on multimodal data in order to improve the predictive performance of fluid intelligence based on neuroimaging features.

Indexed as

AutoencoderDeep LearningFluid IntelligenceShapley ValueStructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID38946976
PMCPMC11213224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.