Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946950›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Perceptions about dementia clinical trials among underrepresented populations: A nationally representative survey of U.S. dementia caregivers.

Brandon Leggins, Danielle M Hart, Ashley J Jackson, Robert W Levenson, Charles C Windon, Jennifer Merrilees, Winston Chiong

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brandon LegginsUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Danielle M HartUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Ashley J JacksonUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Robert W LevensonUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Charles C WindonUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Jennifer MerrileesUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Winston ChiongUniversity of California, San Francisco.

Funding

Decision-Making in Genetic FTDR01AG022983 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHIONG, WINSTON · 2004 to 2021
$6.0M
Reimagining Precision Medicine Approaches to AD DiagnosisR35AG072362 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI POSSIN, KATHERINE LAUREL, RABINOVICI, GIL DAN · 2021 to 2025
$4.8M
Decision-making abilities in Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias: From clinical standards to decision neuroscienceR01AG058817 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHIONG, WINSTON · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022983NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058817NIA NIH HHS R35 AG072362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The research community has historically failed to enroll diverse groups of participants in dementia clinical trials. A unique aspect of dementia care research is the requirement of a study partner, who can attest to the care recipient's clinical and functional capacity. The aim of this study is to assess racial and ethnic differences and the importance of various trial considerations among dementia caregivers, in their decision to participate in clinical research as study partners. Method: We embedded a vignette about a hypothetical dementia clinical trial in a nationally representative survey of U.S. dementia caregivers, oversampling non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic caregivers. Dementia caregivers were asked about their willingness to participate in the trial with their care recipient and rated the importance of nine considerations in hypothetical decisions to participate. Caregiver demographic characteristics were analyzed as predictors of trial participation in a base demographic model. In a second reasons model caregiver demographic characteristics and the rated importance of the nine considerations were separately analyzed as predictors; both models used survey-weighted logistic regression. Result: The sample consisted of 610 dementia caregivers, including 156 non-Hispanic Black and 122 Hispanic caregiver participants. In the base demographic model, hypothetical trial participation was negatively associated with older caregiver age (OR (odds ratio) = 0.72, p = < 0.001). In the reasons model, the rated importance of a social responsibility to help others by participating in research was significantly associated with participation (OR = 1.56, p = 0.049), while the importance of the possibility of the care recipient experiencing serious side effects was negatively associated with participation (OR = 0.51, p = 0.003). In both models there was no significant difference in hypothetical participation between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White caregivers, or between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White caregivers. Conclusion: Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black dementia caregivers were not less likely than non-Hispanic White dementia caregivers to participate in a hypothetical dementia clinical trial. Our study suggests that failures to recruit diverse populations in dementia clinical research are not attributable to less willingness among members of underrepresented groups but may instead reflect structural barriers and historic exclusion from trial participation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecaregivingClinical trialsdementianational surveyrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID38946950
PMCPMC11213196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.