ArticleArthroplasty today2024
Role and Results of Constrained Insert in Computer-Assisted Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Patellofemoral Malalignment Worsened the Outcome of Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty.The journal of knee surgery · 2025Observational
- Lateral femoral epicondylar osteotomy during total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe correctable intra-articular varus and lateral laxity: A case-report.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Mild ligament imbalance is often encountered in the mediolateral plane during complex primary total knee arthroplasty. A constrained (CP) polyethylene insert compatible with the primary femur is useful to manage these cases without the need to fall back on revision implants. The aim of the study was to define the correct indications of the use of a CP insert based on objective data from computer assisted surgery and to compare the early results of a CP insert with a standard posterior stabilized (PS) insert through one-to-one propensity score matching. Methods: This is a retrospective case study from a prospectively collected database. One-to-one matching without replacement was used with a caliper width of 0.2 to match the scores between CP (N = 64) and PS groups (N = 1624), resulting in equal covariate matching of PS (N = 64) and CP (N = 64) cohorts. Patients were assessed radiographically and functionally at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Result: Average coronal and sagittal plane deformities were similar in both the group CP (varus 13.1 ± 5.2 valgus 13 ± 7.9) and the group PS (varus 13.4 ± 4.6 valgus 10.9 ± 8.6). The average residual medial lateral gap difference was significantly higher in group CP (3.8 ± 1.8) in comparison to group PS (1.3 ± 1) ( Conclusions: Constrained insert used with the primary femoral component is a valuable option to handle mild ligamentous instability in complex primary total knee arthroplasty after mechanical alignment is achieved with computer navigation. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.