Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946912›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2024

Lipoprotein Combine Index as a Better Marker for NAFLD Identification Than Traditional Lipid Parameters.

Jiajun Qiu, Xin Huang, Maobin Kuang, Ruijuan Yang, Jiachong Li, Guotai Sheng, Yang Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiajun Qiu *Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Xin Huang *Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Maobin Kuang *Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Ruijuan YangJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Jiachong LiJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Guotai ShengJiangxi Provincial Geriatric Hospital, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5298-4724
Yang ZouJiangxi Cardiovascular Research Institute, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9373-928X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The association between traditional lipid parameters and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been extensively discussed. This study aims to evaluate and compare the lipoprotein combine index (LCI) and traditional lipid parameters [total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] to identify NAFLD. Patients and Methods: The analysis included 14,251 participants from the NAfld in the Gifu Area, Longitudinal Analysis (NAGALA). Logistic regression models were employed to calculate standardized odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for assessing and comparing the association of LCI and traditional lipid parameters with NAFLD. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for LCI and traditional lipid parameters in identifying NAFLD. Results: After adjusting for various confounders, we found that LCI was positively associated with NAFLD (OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.92-2.63), and this association was stronger than that of traditional lipid parameters [OR: TC1.23, TG1.73 LDL-C1.10]. Further subgroup analyses revealed that the association of LCI with NAFLD was stronger than other traditional lipid parameters in all subgroups, including men and women, overweight/obese [body mass index (BMI)≥25 kg/m Conclusion: This study revealed for the first time a positive correlation between LCI and NAFLD. Compared to traditional lipid parameters, LCI has a higher correlation with NAFLD. Additionally, further ROC analysis demonstrated that LCI had higher accuracy in identifying NAFLD compared to traditional lipid parameters, suggesting that LCI may be a better marker for NAFLD identification than traditional lipid parameters.

Indexed as

LCIlipoprotein combine indexNAFLDnon-alcoholic fatty liver diseasetraditional lipid parameters

Identifiers

PMID38946912
PMCPMC11214567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.