ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Cross-talk of MLST and transcriptome unveiling antibiotic resistance mechanism of carbapenem resistance
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From screening to treatment:Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- In vitro activity of Eravacycline against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli and associated risk factors for non-susceptible infections from a tertiary hospital in fujian, China from 2021 to 2024.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with ertapenem using the FAERS database from 2004 to 2024.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: To better understand the local epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Results: These results showed that a total of 9 STs were detected. It was found that 99% of the strains isolated in the hospital belonged to the same STs, and the clone complex CC208 was widely distributed in various departments and all kinds of samples. Furthermore, these Discussion: These results suggest that the CC208 STs were the main clonal complex, and showed high carbapenem antibiotic resistance. All these resistant strains were distributed in various departments, but most of them were distributed in intensive care units (ICU). The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.