Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946858›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2024

Surgical strategies for challenging common bile duct stones in the endoscopic era: A comprehensive review of current evidence.

Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Asada Methasate, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Minoru Tanabe, Keiichi Akita, Thawatchai Akaraviputh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tharathorn SuwatthanarakMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Vitoon ChinswangwatanakulMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Asada MethasateMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chainarong PhalanusitthephaMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Minoru TanabeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo 113-8519, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi AkitaDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo 113-8519, Tokyo, Japan.
Thawatchai AkaraviputhMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi 10700, Bangkok, Thailand. thawatchai.aka@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the primary treatment modality for common bile duct stones (CBDS) or choledocholithiasis due to advancements in instruments, surgical intervention, known as common bile duct exploration (CBDE), is still necessary in cases of difficult CBDS, failed endoscopic treatment, or altered anatomy. Recent evidence also supports CBDE in patients requesting single-step cholecystectomy and bile duct stone removal with comparable outcomes. This review elucidates relevant clinical anatomy, selection indications, and outcomes to enhance surgical understanding. The selection between trans-cystic (TC)

Indexed as

CholedocholithiasisCommon bile duct explorationCommon bile duct stoneDifficult common bile duct stoneLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Identifiers

PMID38946858
PMCPMC11212516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.