Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946788›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Differential dietary intake and contribution of ultra-processed foods during pregnancy according to nutritional status.

Adriana Granich-Armenta, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra Cantoral, Dirk L Christensen, Joaquín A Marrón-Ponce, Laura Ávila-Jímenez, Ivonne Ramírez-Silva, Juan A Rivera Dommarco, Louise G Grunnet, Ib C Bygbjerg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adriana Granich-ArmentaCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alejandra Contreras-ManzanoCONAHCYT, Nutrition and Health Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alejandra CantoralHealth Department, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.
Dirk L ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, Section of Global Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joaquín A Marrón-PonceNutrition and Health Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Laura Ávila-JímenezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Ivonne Ramírez-SilvaNutrition and Health Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Juan A Rivera DommarcoCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Louise G GrunnetClinical Prevention Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Ib C BygbjergDepartment of Public Health, Section of Global Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Héctor Lamadrid-FigueroaCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Frequent consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) during pregnancy is linked to excess intake of added sugar, fat, and sodium and inadequacy of several micronutrients. Diet quality during pregnancy should be maximized as inadequate levels of key nutrients and excessive intake of energy and added sugar might influence mother-child health. We aimed to estimate the contribution (% of total calories) of ultra-processed products to the total energy intake by pre-gestational body mass index (BMI) categories and Hb status during pregnancy in participants from the MAS-Lactancia Cohort. Methods: Pre-gestational weight, hemoglobin levels, 24-h dietary intake recall interviews, and sociodemographic data were collected during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Reported consumed foods were categorized using the NOVA classification, and the contribution of calories from each NOVA category was estimated using the Mexican Food Database. We estimated medians and interquartile ranges (p25 and p75) for dietary intake and energy contributions. The comparison of intake between the second and third trimesters was done using the Wilcoxon test. In addition, a quantile regression model with an interaction between pre-gestational BMI and Hb levels status in tertiles over the percentage of energy from UPFs was adjusted by age and socioeconomic status. Results: The contribution to total energy intake from UPFs was 27.4% in the second trimester and 27% in the third trimester (with no statistical difference). The percentage of energy intake from UPFs was higher in women who started pregnancy with obesity and presented the lowest levels of Hb (1st tertile), 23.1, 35.8, and 44.7% for the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively, compared to those with normal BMI and the highest tertile of Hb levels: 18, 29.0, and 38.6% for the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, UPF intake in pregnant women is similar to the general population and was higher for those with pre-gestational obesity and the lowest tertile of Hb levels. UPF contributes also to sugar, saturated fat, and sodium, which may adversely affect the health of mothers and their offspring.

Indexed as

hemoglobin levelsNOVA classificationnutritional statuspre-gestational BMIultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID38946788
PMCPMC11211352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.