Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946777›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Prediction of ovarian cancer using artificial intelligence tools.

Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh, Marjan Ahmadi, Alireza Banaye Yazdipour, Fatemeh Ghorbani-Bidkorpeh, Mahnaz Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Two-stage sampling for better survival model performance.BMC medical research methodology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seyed Mohammad AyyoubzadehDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-7818
Marjan AhmadiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Alireza Banaye YazdipourDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-2640
Fatemeh Ghorbani-BidkorpehDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mahnaz AhmadiMedical Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5225-7989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ovarian cancer is a common type of cancer and a leading cause of death in women. Therefore, accurate and fast prediction of ovarian tumors is crucial. One of the appropriate and precise methods for predicting and diagnosing this cancer is to build a model based on artificial intelligence methods. These methods provide a tool for predicting ovarian cancer according to the characteristics and conditions of each person. Method: In this study, a data set included records related to 171 cases of benign ovarian tumors, and 178 records related to cases of ovarian cancer were analyzed. The data set contains the records of blood test results and tumor markers of the patients. After data preprocessing, including removing outliers and replacing missing values, the weight of the effective factors was determined using information gain indices and the Gini index. In the next step, predictive models were created using random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), decision trees (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN) models. The performance of these models was evaluated using the 10-fold cross-validation method using the indicators of specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Finally, by comparing the performance of the models, the best predictive model of ovarian cancer was selected. Results: The most important predictive factors were HE4, CA125, and NEU. The RF model was identified as the best predictive model, with an accuracy of more than 86%. The predictive accuracy of DT, SVM, and ANN models was estimated as 82.91%, 85.25%, and 79.35%, respectively. Various artificial intelligence (AI) tools can be used with high accuracy and sensitivity in predicting ovarian cancer. Conclusion: Therefore, the use of these tools can help specialists and patients with early, easier, and less expensive diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Future studies can leverage AI to integrate image data with serum biomarkers, thereby facilitating the creation of novel models and advancing the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID38946777
PMCPMC11211920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.