Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946757›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2024

Empathetic Communication in Telemedicine: A Pilot Study.

Vinita Subramanya, Julia Spychalski, Sarah Coats, Elisheva Gottstein, John Chancellor, Ambar Kulshreshtha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinita SubramanyaDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Julia SpychalskiDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Sarah CoatsEmory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Elisheva GottsteinDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
John ChancellorEmory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Ambar KulshreshthaDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA | Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In health care, empathy is a clinician's ability to understand a patient's emotional state and convey that understanding in their care; and being culturally sensitive is communicating and respecting cultural differences. Providing health care on digital platforms introduces a new challenge of conveying empathy and cultural sensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate whether patients who were seen in-person had different perceptions of clinicians' empathy and cultural sensitivity compared to those who were seen via telemedicine. Methods: In this cross-sectional pilot study, we recruited primary care clinicians (N=8) and their telemedicine (N=14) and in-person patients (N=20) from two clinics at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. We evaluated clinicians' empathy and cultural sensitivity by self-report and from patients' standpoints. Results: Patient perception of clinician empathy scores were similar ( Conclusions: This novel pilot study demonstrated comparable empathy and culturally sensitive communication scores in telemedicine and in-person visits, highlighting the potential for continued use of telemedicine in outpatient primary care. Delivery of care via telemedicine can enable an expansion of high-quality care to underserved communities. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings to enhance the experience of telemedicine visits for patients and clinicians.

Identifiers

PMID38946757
PMCPMC11212695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.