Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946632›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association2024

Translation, cultural adaptation, and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Arabic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (Ar-GerdQ).

Nasser M AbuDujain, Mohammed A Batais, Mohamad Ayham Muqresh, Ziyad Aljofan, Hani A Alghamdi, Ahmad Bashmail, Abdullah A Alrasheed, Turky Almigbal, Rahaf Alsemairi, Jan G Hatlebakk

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rethinking about the definition of GERD.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nasser M AbuDujainDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A BataisDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad Ayham MuqreshCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad AljofanCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hani A AlghamdiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad BashmailDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AlrasheedDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Turky AlmigbalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rahaf AlsemairiCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11495, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jan G HatlebakkDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Gastroenterology, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic digestive disease that affects people in different communities at different rates. Because of the absence of a validated Arabic tool to assess GERD symptoms, this study aimed to validate and culturally adapt the GERD questionnaire (GerdQ) tool to Arabic speakers.

methodsPatients referred for pH testing with symptoms suggestive of GERD were recruited. A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2023 to April 2023 by administering the Arabic GERD questionnaire (Ar-GerdQ) tool on two different occasions and comparing it with the short-form leeds dyspepsia questionnaire and the Reflux Symptom Index to establish reliability and construct validity.

resultsA total of 52 participants were included in the study. The results of the internal consistency analysis of the Ar-GerdQ indicate that the test has good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91). Significant positive correlations with the short form leeds dyspepsia questionnaire (r = 0.59, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.29-0.78) and the reflux symptom index (r = 0.47, P = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.13-0.71) were demonstrated. Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient value was 0.60 ( P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.28-0.77), indicating a substantial level of agreement between the measurements.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that the Ar-GerdQ is useful for assessing reflux disease symptoms among Arabic speakers. Effective utilization of Ar-GerdQ will reduce unnecessary endoscopic requests in primary care settings.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxPsychometricsTranslationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDyspepsiaFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38946632
PMCPMC11630485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.