Trial reportNeuro-oncology2024
Encorafenib and binimetinib followed by radiotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastases (E-BRAIN/GEM1802 phase II study).
Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06887088 (Phase II, Single Arm, Multicentre Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Activity of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Followed by Cemiplimab And Fianlimab in Patients With BRAF Mutated Melanoma and Symptomatic Brain Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II, Single Arm, Multicentre Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Activity of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Followed by Cemiplimab And Fianlimab in Patients With BRAF Mutated Melanoma and Symptomatic Brain Metastases
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical management of BRAF inhibitors in glioma: toxicity and resistance.CNS oncology · 2026Review
- Exploring the landscape of targetable alterations in patients with glioblastoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Integrated approaches to sensitizing melanoma to radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Review
- The role of radiotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma failing targeted therapy.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma: from resistance mechanisms to therapeutic innovations.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Unraveling the Enigma of Melanoma Brain Metastasis: New Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Current and emerging strategies for the management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases in melanoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Crosstalk in the brain tumor microenvironment: mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and clinical advances.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- The safety and efficacy of encorafenib plus binimetinib for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Personalized therapies in advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma: review based on 3 case reports of the REMINISCENCE project.Melanoma management · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Article
- The safety and efficacy of dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with brain metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma brain metastases: Results from the BECARE (GEM-2002) trial.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEncorafenib plus binimetinib (EB) is a standard-of-care treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. We assessed the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastasis (BM) and explored if radiotherapy improves the duration of response.
methodsE-BRAIN/GEM1802 was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial that enrolled patients with melanoma BRAFV600-mutant and BM. Patients received encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg BID, and those who achieved a partial response or stable disease at first tumor assessment were offered radiotherapy. Treatment continued until progression. Primary endpoint was intracranial response rate (icRR) after 2 months of EB, establishing a futility threshold of 60%.
resultsThe study included 25 patients with no BM symptoms and 23 patients with BM symptoms regardless of using corticosteroids. Among them, 31 patients (64.6%) received sequential radiotherapy. After 2 months, icRR was 70.8% (95% CI: 55.9-83.1); 10.4% complete response. Median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 8.5 (95% CI: 6.4-11.8) and 15.9 (95% CI: 10.7-21.4) months, respectively (8.3 months for icPFS and 13.9 months OS for patients receiving RDT). Most common grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (10.4%).
conclusionsEncorafenib plus binimetinib showed promising clinical benefit in terms of icRR, and tolerable safety profile with low frequency of high-grade TRAEs, in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and BM, including those with symptoms and need for steroids. Sequential radiotherapy is feasible but it does not seem to prolong response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.