Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946443›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2024

COVID-19 health information system assessments in eight European countries: identified gaps, best practices and recommendations.

Miriam Saso, Nienke Schutte, Marika Borg, Neville Calleja, Andrea E Schmidt, Mariana Peyroteo, Luís Velez Lapão, Angela Fehr, Martin Thißen, Michael Courtney and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Miriam SasoHealth Information System Unit, Scientific Directorate of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-1913
Nienke SchutteHealth Information System Unit, Scientific Directorate of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8064-2569
Marika BorgMinistry for Health, Valletta, Malta.
Neville CallejaMinistry for Health, Valletta, Malta.
Andrea E SchmidtDepartment of Climate & Health, Austrian National Public Health Institute (GÖG), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1408-321X
Mariana PeyroteoCHRC, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS, FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4976-2826
Luís Velez LapãoCHRC, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS, FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Angela FehrCentre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Martin ThißenDepartment for Health Monitoring and Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-5650
Michael CourtneyDepartment of Health, Dublin, Ireland.
Petronille BogaertHealth Information System Unit, Scientific Directorate of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6983-9571

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 10108317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal threats, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, have highlighted the critical importance of robust and well-functioning health information systems (HIS) in effectively addressing public health emergencies. To enhance the understanding and the functioning of such systems, it is crucial to perform HIS assessments. This article explores key gaps and identifies best practices in the COVID-19 HIS of eight European countries. Furthermore, it provides recommendations to strengthen European systems for better pandemic preparedness.

methodsAssessments were carried out in eight European countries using an adapted version of the WHO support tool to strengthen HIS and the Joint Action on Health Information assessment tool. The assessments took place between January 2022 and April 2023.

resultsFour main themes emerged regarding the gaps and best practices identified in the various HIS: organizational, technical, legal and resources. The results of these assessments show different approaches implemented by countries to improve their HIS and respond to the demands of the pandemic.

conclusionsIt is imperative for countries to draw valuable insights from the COVID-19 pandemic and strengthen their HIS. This involves the adaptation or development of pandemic preparedness plans, strengthening legislative framework for data sharing and privacy protection, promotion of data standards and international definitions and implementation of a unique person identifier. Additionally, countries will have to act in this post-pandemic era and integrate the newly developed systems and innovations into existing structures, maintain and develop trust by citizens through transparent communication and engage in infodemic management and address resource gaps in the workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Information SystemsEuropeHumansInformation DisseminationPandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38946443
PMCPMC11215322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.