Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946355›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2024

Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians.

Pablo Miguel Lucas, Moreno Di Marco, Victor Cazalis, Jennifer Luedtke, Kelsey Neam, Mary H Brown, Penny F Langhammer, Giordano Mancini, Luca Santini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pablo Miguel LucasDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-9748
Moreno Di MarcoDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-4193
Victor CazalisGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0850-883X
Jennifer LuedtkeIUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-978X
Kelsey NeamIUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1994-4346
Mary H BrownRe:wild, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3974-0172
Penny F LanghammerRe:wild, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-343X
Giordano ManciniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9208-4253
Luca SantiniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-3688

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig 202548816Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig FZT 118Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, Programma Operativo Nazionale CUPB85F21005360001Junta de Andalucía EMERGIA20_00135MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR CNS2022-136018Microsoft Grant number: 5313.006-AI4EMUR Rita Levi Montalcini programRe:wild Grant number: 5313.006-AI4ESapienza Università di Roma AR22117A859F7D58
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the extinction risk of species based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (RL) is key to guiding conservation policies and reducing biodiversity loss. This process is resource demanding, however, and requires continuous updating, which becomes increasingly difficult as new species are added to the RL. Automatic methods, such as comparative analyses used to predict species RL category, can be an efficient alternative to keep assessments up to date. Using amphibians as a study group, we predicted which species are more likely to change their RL category and thus should be prioritized for reassessment. We used species biological traits, environmental variables, and proxies of climate and land-use change as predictors of RL category. We produced an ensemble prediction of IUCN RL category for each species by combining 4 different model algorithms: cumulative link models, phylogenetic generalized least squares, random forests, and neural networks. By comparing RL categories with the ensemble prediction and accounting for uncertainty among model algorithms, we identified species that should be prioritized for future reassessment based on the mismatch between predicted and observed values. The most important predicting variables across models were species' range size and spatial configuration of the range, biological traits, climate change, and land-use change. We compared our proposed prioritization index and the predicted RL changes with independent IUCN RL reassessments and found high performance of both the prioritization and the predicted directionality of changes in RL categories. Ensemble modeling of RL category is a promising tool for prioritizing species for reassessment while accounting for models' uncertainty. This approach is broadly applicable to all taxa on the IUCN RL and to regional and national assessments and may improve allocation of the limited human and economic resources available to maintain an up-to-date IUCN RL.

Indexed as

AmphibiansBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsClimate ChangeRisk Assessmentamphibiansanálisis comparativoanfibioscambio climáticoclimate changecomparative analysisensemble modelextinction riskIUCNIUCN Red ListLista Roja de la UICNmodelo de ensambleprioritizepriorizarriesgo de extinciónUICN

Identifiers

PMID38946355
PMCPMC11589027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.