Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946312›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Duplications and Retrogenes Are Numerous and Widespread in Modern Canine Genomic Assemblies.

Anthony K Nguyen, Matthew S Blacksmith, Jeffrey M Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fine-scale recombination rates inferred using the canFam4 assembly are strongly correlated with previous maps of dog recombination.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Absence ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony K NguyenDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-1904
Matthew S BlacksmithDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2993-9009
Jeffrey M KiddDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9631-1465

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007544 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1985 to 2022
$11.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the number of canine genome assemblies available. Duplications are an important source of evolutionary novelty and are also prone to misassembly. We explored the duplication content of nine canine genome assemblies using both genome self-alignment and read-depth approaches. We find that 8.58% of the genome is duplicated in the canFam4 assembly, derived from the German Shepherd Dog Mischka, including 90.15% of unplaced contigs. Highlighting the continued difficulty in properly assembling duplications, less than half of read-depth and assembly alignment duplications overlap, but the mCanLor1.2 Greenland wolf assembly shows greater concordance. Further study shows the presence of multiple segments that have alignments to four or more duplicate copies. These high-recurrence duplications correspond to gene retrocopies. We identified 3,892 candidate retrocopies from 1,316 parental genes in the canFam4 assembly and find that ∼8.82% of duplicated base pairs involve a retrocopy, confirming this mechanism as a major driver of gene duplication in canines. Similar patterns are found across eight other recent canine genome assemblies, with metrics supporting a greater quality of the PacBio HiFi mCanLor1.2 assembly. Comparison between the wolf and other canine assemblies found that 92% of retrocopy insertions are shared between assemblies. By calculating the number of generations since genome divergence, we estimate that new retrocopy insertions appear, on average, in 1 out of 3,514 births. Our analyses illustrate the impact of retrogene formation on canine genomes and highlight the variable representation of duplicated sequences among recently completed canine assemblies.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenomeAnimalsDogsEvolution, MolecularGenomicsRetroelementsRetroelementsalignmentgenomeread-depthretrocopysegmental duplication

Identifiers

PMID38946312
PMCPMC11259980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.