Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946242›Full record

ReviewJournal of midwifery & women's health

Patient-Provider Trust as a Key Component of Prenatal Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACES): A Concept Analysis.

Paige D Gilliland, Jennifer E Phipps, Breän Derret, Indira D'Souza, Stephanie Ha, Shwetha Patil, Leigh Ann Simmons

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paige D GillilandUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.ORCID 0009-0001-2197-626X
Jennifer E PhippsUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.
Breän DerretUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.
Indira D'SouzaUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.
Stephanie HaUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.
Shwetha PatilUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.
Leigh Ann SimmonsUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Human Ecology, Perinatal Origins of Disparities Center, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-5723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe concept of patient-provider trust in prenatal adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screening remains unexplored. This concept analysis illuminates the role of trust in prenatal ACE screening to improve patient-provider relationships, increase patient uptake of ACE screening, and ensure that ACE screening is implemented in a strengths-based, trauma-informed way.

methodsA concept analysis was conducted using the Rodgers' evolutionary method to define the antecedents, attributes, and consequences of this construct. The databases searched were PubMed, PsychInfo, and Scopus between 2010 and 2021. A total of 389 articles were retrieved using the search terms prenatal, adverse childhood experiences screening, adverse childhood experiences, and adverse childhood experiences questionnaire. Included articles for detailed review contained prenatal screening, trauma screening (ACE or other), trust or building trust between patient and health care provider, patient engagement, and shared decision making. Excluded articles were those not in the context of prenatal care and that were exclusively about screening with no discussion about the patient-provider relationship or patient perspectives. A total of 32 articles were reviewed for this concept analysis.

resultsWe define trust in prenatal ACE screening as a network of evidence-based attributes that include the timing of the screening, patient familiarity with the health care provider, cultural competence, demystifying trauma, open dialogue between the patient and health care provider, and patient comfort and respect. DISCUSSION: This concept analysis elucidates the importance of ACE screening and provides suggestions for establishing trust in the context of prenatal ACE screening. Results give insight and general guidance for health care providers looking to implement ACE screening in a trauma-informed way. Further research is needed to evaluate pregnant patients' attitudes toward ACE screening and how a health care provider's trauma history might influence their care. More inquiry is needed to understand the racial, ethnic, and cultural barriers to ACE screening.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesMass ScreeningPhysician-Patient RelationsPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisProfessional-Patient RelationsTrustFemaleHumansPregnancyadverse childhood experiences (ACEs)birth outcomesholistic midwifery practicepatient‐provider relationshipsprenatal carescreeningtrust

Identifiers

PMID38946242
PMCPMC11803494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.