Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946144›Full record

ArticleJournal of addictive diseases

Development and validation of machine-learning algorithms predicting retention, overdoses, and all-cause mortality among US military veterans treated with buprenorphine for opioid use disorder.

Corey J Hayes, Nahiyan Bin Noor, Rebecca A Raciborski, Bradley C Martin, Adam J Gordon, Katherine J Hoggatt, Teresa Hudson, Michael A Cucciare

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of addictive diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corey J HayesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7776-6157
Nahiyan Bin NoorInstitute for Digital Health and Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Rebecca A RaciborskiCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-9074
Bradley C MartinDivision of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Adam J GordonProgram for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2453-8871
Katherine J HoggattSan Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Teresa HudsonCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.
Michael A CucciareCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
HSRD VA IK2 HX003358NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuprenorphine for opioid use disorder (B-MOUD) is essential to improving patient outcomes; however, retention is essential.

objectiveTo develop and validate machine-learning algorithms predicting retention, overdoses, and all-cause mortality among US military veterans initiating B-MOUD.

methodsVeterans initiating B-MOUD from fiscal years 2006-2020 were identified. Veterans' B-MOUD episodes were randomly divided into training (80%;

resultsEpisodes in the training sample were 93.0% male, 78.0% White, 72.3% unemployed, and 48.3% had a concurrent drug use disorder. The GBM model slightly outperformed others in predicting B-MOUD retention (AUC-ROC = 0.72). RF models outperformed others in predicting any overdose (AUC-ROC = 0.77) and opioid overdose (AUC-ROC = 0.77). RF and GBM outperformed other models for overdose death (AUC-ROC = 0.74 for both), and RF and DNN outperformed other models for opioid overdose death (RF AUC-ROC = 0.79; DNN AUC-ROC = 0.78). RF and GBM also outperformed other models for all-cause mortality (AUC-ROC = 0.76 for both). No single predictor accounted for >3% of the model's variance.

conclusionsMachine-learning algorithms can accurately predict OUD-related outcomes with moderate predictive performance; however, prediction of these outcomes is driven by many characteristics.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug OverdoseMachine LearningNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdoseOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersVeteransAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesBuprenorphineNarcotic Antagonistsbuprenorphinemachine-learning algorithmsopioid use disorderpredictive modelingVeterans

Identifiers

PMID38946144
PMCPMC13056003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.