Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38946052›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

Assessing numeracy and medication calculations within undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study.

Christine Minty-Walker, Nathan J Wilson, Leanne Rylands, Jim Pettigrew, Leanne Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How do senior pharmacy students at King Saud University perceive their pharmaceutical calculation skills and preparedness for clinical practice?Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine Minty-WalkerSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7881-240X
Nathan J WilsonSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-2099
Leanne RylandsCentre for Research in Mathematics and Data Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-8706
Jim PettigrewSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3816-5607
Leanne HuntSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-2874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore how undergraduate nursing students are assessed on nursing numeracy and medication calculations from the perspective of Australian nurse education leaders.

designA qualitative study.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 nurse education leaders between November 2022 and January 2023. Braun and Clarke's six phases of thematic analysis were used to analyse the data.

resultsFive key themes were identified: (i) high expectations to keep the public safe, (ii) diverse assessment formats, (iii) different ways of managing assessment integrity, (iv) assessment conditions incongruent to the clinical setting and (v) supporting struggling students.

conclusionNurse education leaders set high standards requiring students to achieve 100% in numeracy and medication calculation assessments, thus maintaining the reputation of nursing and patient safety. However, students struggled to meet this expectation. Diverse assessment formats were implemented, with some examination conditions contrary to clinical practice. Currently, there is no benchmark or independent point of registration examination in Australia, hence the problem is each university had a different standard to judge students' competence. Gaining insight into how these assessments are conducted provides an opportunity to work towards an evidence-based model or benchmark for the assessment of numeracy. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Dosage errors in clinical practice threaten patient safety and the reputation of the nursing profession. The accuracy rate of calculations by undergraduate and registered nurses is deficient worldwide. This research highlights a major educational issue, that being the wide variation in how numeracy assessments are conducted with no clear pedagogical rationale for a standardised method. Such assessments would establish a national standard, contributing to quality assurance, the development of the nursing profession and improve patient safety.

Indexed as

Drug Dosage CalculationsEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateQualitative ResearchStudents, NursingAdultAustraliaClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedication Errorsassessmentdosage competencymedication calculationsnursing numeracypatient safetyundergraduate educationundergraduate nursing students

Identifiers

PMID38946052
PMCPMC11214913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.